The Hawthorne Studies Introduction to Business

21 Sep The Hawthorne Studies Introduction to Business

Another group, called as control group, continued to work under constant intensities of illumination. The researchers found that as they increased the illumination in the experimental group, both groups increased production. When the intensity of illumination decreased, the production continued to increase in both the groups.

The social organisation of the company represents a system of values from which the worker derives satisfaction or dissatisfaction according to the perception of his social status and the expected social rewards. The position or status of worker in the company is a reference from which the worker assigns meaning and value to the events, objects and features of his environment such as hours of work, wages, etc. The interview programme gave valuable insights about the human behaviour in the company.

Our Subjects

The outcome implied that the increase in productivity was merely the result of a motivational effect on the company’s workers (Cox, 2000). During the first study, a group of workers who made electrical relays experienced several changes in lighting. Their performance was observed in response to the minutest alterations in illumination. The company had sought to ascertain whether there was a relationship between productivity and the work environments (e.g., the level of lighting in a factory).

Bank Wiring Observation Room Study

Conducted by Elton Mayo and his team at the Western Electric Company in the 1920s and 1930s, the experiments aimed to investigate the effects of various working conditions on employee productivity. However, they also uncovered a fascinating phenomenon that would later come to be known as the Hawthorne Effect. A classic study was conducted by Elton Mayo, at the Hawthorne Works in Illinois. It was an overt non-participant observation or field experiment, in which workers’ productivity was observed against a number of variables. One way to try and avoid the Hawthorne Effect is to use covert observation so that the subjects of the study are unaware that they are being studied.

1. The style of supervision affects worker’s attitude to work and his productivity.
2. Thus, it was concluded that illumination did not have any effect on productivity but something else was interfering with the productivity.
3. The productivity decreased slightly and the girls complained that frequent rest intervals affected the rhythm of the work.
4. This phase aimed at knowing not only the impact of illumination on production but also other factors like length of the working day, rest hours, and other physical conditions.
5. Erika Rasure is globally-recognized as a leading consumer economics subject matter expert, researcher, and educator.
6. The findings of the Hawthorne experiments have played a significant role in shaping the field of management and organizational behavior.
7. This suggested that the workers were responding to the fact that they were being observed, rather than any specific changes in their working environment.

This suggests that simple things like showing appreciation for employees’ efforts and giving them opportunities for growth and development can have a significant impact on their motivation and performance. The Hawthorne studies were a series of experiments conducted between the 1920s and 1930s at the Western Electric Company’s Hawthorne Works in Chicago. These studies aimed to investigate the relationship between productivity and the work environment. The findings of the Hawthorne studies have been widely discussed and debated since their publication, and their impact can still be felt in workplaces today. The researchers of the Hawthorne Studies noticed that employee productivity increased not only in improved conditions (like better lighting), but also in unchanged or even worsened conditions. The Hawthorne studies showed that people’s work performance is dependent on social issues and job satisfaction.

Relay assembly experiments

1. To establish a baseline productivity level, the measurement was begun in secret two weeks before the women were moved to the experiment room, and then continued throughout the study.
2. The main objective was to determine the effects of various physical and environmental conditions, such as lighting and break times, on worker productivity.
3. The results of the study seemed to indicate that workers were likely to be influenced more by the social force of their peer groups than the incentives of their superiors.
4. One of the key insights from the Hawthorne experiments was that the physical and social environment in which work takes place can have a significant impact on individual behavior and performance.
5. Fear of unemployment, fear of increase in output, desire to protect slow workers etc.

For the most part, changes to these variables (including returns to the original state) were accompanied by an increase in productivity. This phenomenon implies that when people become aware that they are subjects in an experiment, the attention they receive from the experimenters may cause them to change their conduct. Experiments have shown that the output increases when workers are explained the logic behind various decisions and their participation in decision making brings better results. Productivity increases as a result of improved working conditions in the organisation.

Sign in to view more content

Whichever management structure an organisation is to adopt, regular reviews are to be carried out in order to keep a stable output and good standard in quality. Such a strategy will ensure continuous evolution of the organizational management and a successful organization producing maximum efficiency in its produce. While there is no universally agreed-upon methodology for achieving this, experience and keen attention to the experiment hewthrone experiment was conducted by the situation can help researchers prevent this effect from tarnishing their results. The Hawthorne Effect is when people change or improve their behavior because they know they’re being watched. The Novelty Effect denotes the tendency of human performance to show improvements in response to novel stimuli in the environment (Clark & Sugrue, 1988). The Hawthorne Experiments, conducted at Western Electric’s Hawthorne plant in the 1920s and 30s, fundamentally influenced management theories.

On the positive side, the effect can lead to increased motivation and productivity among workers who feel that their efforts are being recognized and valued. On the negative side, the effect can lead to a sense of pressure and anxiety among workers who feel that they are being constantly monitored and evaluated. Overall, the findings of the Hawthorne studies have had a significant impact on modern workplace practices. By understanding the importance of employee engagement and group dynamics, employers can create a positive work environment that promotes productivity, collaboration, and growth. What the original researchers found was that any change in a variable, such as lighting levels, led to an improvement in productivity.

However, the strategy did not work and workers established their own standard of output and this was enforced vigorously by various methods of social pressure. Fear of unemployment, fear of increase in output, desire to protect slow workers etc. They become related to employee satisfaction or dissatisfaction only as the employee comes to view them from his personal situation. Since there was more freedom of work, they developed a sense of responsibility and self-discipline. The relationship between supervisor and workers became close and friendly. For example, a company could implement a recognition program that rewards employees for their hard work and dedication.

When the original data finally did resurface, several scholars were able to debunk the initial findings. Additionally, modern attempts to replicate the Hawthorne Effect have been inconclusive. Only seven out of 40 such studies found any evidence of the effect. When analyzing the results, researchers concluded that the Hawthorne Effect negatively impacted the data, as there was no evidence that the cerebellar neurostimulators were measurably effective. Their awareness of being observed had apparently led them to increase their output. It seemed that increased attention from supervisors could improve job performance.